Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Research on segmentation of the hippocampus in magnetic resonance images through deep learning convolutional neural networks (CNNs) shows promising results, suggesting that these methods can identify small structural abnormalities of the hippocampus, which are among the earliest and most frequent brain changes associated with Alzheimer disease (AD). However, CNNs typically achieve the highest accuracy on datasets acquired from the same domain as the training dataset. Transfer learning allows domain adaptation through further training on a limited dataset. In this study, we applied transfer learning on a network called spatial warping network segmentation (SWANS), developed and trained in a previous study. We used MR images of patients with clinical diagnoses of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and AD, segmented by two different raters. By using transfer learning techniques, we developed four new models, using different training methods. Testing was performed using 26% of the original dataset, which was excluded from training as a hold-out test set. In addition, 10% of the overall training dataset was used as a hold-out validation set. Results showed that all the new models achieved better hippocampal segmentation quality than the baseline SWANS model (ps  < .001), with high similarity to the manual segmentations (mean dice [best model] = 0.878 ± 0.003). The best model was chosen based on visual assessment and volume percentage error (VPE). The increased precision in estimating hippocampal volumes allows the detection of small hippocampal abnormalities already present in the MCI phase (SD = [3.9 ± 0.6]%), which may be crucial for early diagnosis.

More information Original publication

DOI

10.1002/hbm.25858

Type

Journal article

Publication Date

2022-08-01T00:00:00+00:00

Volume

43

Pages

3427 - 3438

Total pages

11

Addresses

H, e, a, l, t, h, , P, h, y, s, i, c, s, , U, n, i, t, ,, , A, z, i, e, n, d, a, , O, s, p, e, d, a, l, i, e, r, a, , d, i, , M, o, d, e, n, a, ,, , M, o, d, e, n, a, ,, , I, t, a, l, y, .

Keywords

Hippocampus, Humans, Alzheimer Disease, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Cognitive Dysfunction, Deep Learning, Neural Networks, Computer