Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the extent of non-publication or delayed publication of registered randomized trials on vaccines, and to investigate potential determinants of delay to publication.DesignSurvey.Data sourcesTrials registry websites, Scopus, PubMed, Google.Study selectionRandomized controlled trials evaluating the safety or the efficacy or immunogenicity of human papillomavirus (HPV), pandemic A/H1N1 2009 influenza, and meningococcal, pneumococcal, and rotavirus vaccines that were registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, Current Controlled Trials, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, Clinical Study Register, or Indian, Australian-New Zealand, and Chinese trial registries in 2006-12. Electronic databases were searched up to February 2014 to identify published manuscripts containing trial results. These were reviewed and classified as positive, mixed, or negative. We also reviewed the results available in ClinicalTrials.gov.Main outcome measuresPublication status of trial results and time from completion to publication in peer reviewed journals.Data synthesisCox proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate potential predictors of publication delay.ResultsWe analysed 384 trials (85% sponsored by industry). Of 355 trials (404,758 participants) that were completed, 176 (n=151,379) had been published in peer reviewed journals. Another 42 trials (total sample 62,765) remained unpublished but reported results in ClinicalTrials.gov. The proportion of trials published 12, 24, 36, and 48 months after completion was 12%, 29%, 53%, and 73%, respectively. Including results posted in ClinicalTrials.gov, 48 months after study completion results were available for 82% of the trials and 90% of the participants. Delay to publication between non-industry and industry sponsored trials did not differ, but non-industry sponsored trials were 4.42-fold (P=0.008) more likely to report negative or mixed findings. Negative results were reported by only 2% of the published trials.ConclusionsMost vaccine trials are published eventually or the results posted in ClinicalTrials.gov, but delays to publication of several years are common. Actions should focus on the timely dissemination of data from vaccine trials to the public.

Original publication

DOI

10.1136/bmj.g3058

Type

Journal article

Journal

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)

Publication Date

05/2014

Volume

348

Addresses

Department of Medicine and Aging Sciences, University of Chieti, Via dei Vestini 5 66013 Chieti, Italy CeSI Biotech, Via Colle dell'Ara, Chieti, Italy lmanzoli@post.harvard.edu.

Keywords

Humans, Bacterial Vaccines, Viral Vaccines, Bibliometrics, Databases, Factual, Publishing, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic